By Global Times, editorial, opinion
Japanese Minister for Foreign
Affairs Takeshi Iwaya was invited to visit China on Wednesday. Last month,
Chinese President Xi Jinping met with Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba in
Peru, and the two sides agreed to work together to comprehensively advance the
strategic relationship of mutual benefit between China and Japan and endeavor
to build a constructive and stable China-Japan relationship fit for the new
era. When meeting Iwaya on Wednesday, Chinese Premier Li Qiang said China is
willing to work with Japan to implement the important consensus reached by the
leaders of the two countries. Later, at the second meeting of High-Level
Consultation Mechanism on People-to-People and Cultural Exchanges between China
and Japan attended by Wang Yi, a member of the Political Bureau of the CPC
Central Committee and Chinese Foreign Minister, and Iwaya, China and Japan
reached 10 important consensuses, including vigorously promoting youth
exchanges and visits and introducing more facilitation measures to promote mutual
visits of tourists.
This is not only Iwaya's first visit to China since he became foreign minister,
but also the first China visit by a Japanese foreign minister since April last
year when Yoshimasa Hayashi paid a visit to China. Compared with the past,
Japanese public opinion has special expectations for Iwaya. The current
China-Japan relations are in a critical period of improvement and development.
After the Ishiba administration took office, the policy toward China emphasized
more on pragmatic cooperation, and a series of bilateral dialogues between
China and Japan have been gradually resumed. Ishiba claimed himself as a
disciple of former Japanese prime minister Kakuei Tanaka, who sent then-foreign
minister Masayoshi Ohira to visit China to promote the normalization of
bilateral relations. It is clear that the Japanese side has taken Iwaya's visit
to China as an opportunity to improve relations between the two countries.
It is not by chance that "constructive" and "stabilization"
have become the consensus between the two countries during this period. In the
past few years, China and Japan have suffered a difficult period rarely seen
since the normalization of bilateral relations, causing great damage to the
exchange and mutual trust between the two countries at all levels. The lesson
is profound, and there has been a lot of reflection on this from the Japanese
side.
Before his visit to China, Iwaya mentioned in an interview that China is a very
important and eternal neighbor of Japan. He said that Japan has already made
statements on historical issues in the past, and it is important to carry on
the spirit of those statements. It is inappropriate to keep mentioning a
potential invasion of the island of Taiwan, he noted. All of these statements
clearly point to something that deserves recognition. In addition, some voices
in Japan have also called for a change from the policy of "taking sides
with the US" back to the track of "Japan-US alliance and Japan-China
coordination." The Ishiba administration's practical actions to promote
the improvement and development of China-Japan relations have a public opinion
basis.
More importantly, the true foundation for the stable development of China-Japan
relations has always been rooted in the practical need for exchanges and
cooperation between the two countries and even the region. This is fundamental.
One detail is worth reflecting on: After China decided to implement unilateral
visa-free entry trials for ordinary passport holders from Japan, on December
For Japan, this means being included in the "fast track" for regional
integration development. In recent days, Japanese media reported that Toyota
plans to establish a new electric vehicle factory in China. A blue book on the
Japanese economy jointly released by the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences and
other institutions this month also shows that Japan's major companies are
choosing to remain in China to operate, expecting to continue profiting from
China rather than considering withdrawal or downsizing. This proves that
"decoupling and supply chain disruption" is not in line with the
reality of China-Japan relations, and any attempt to promote it between China
and Japan is unlikely to come to realization.
In China-Japan interactions, China often focuses on the directional aspects of
bilateral relations, while the Japanese public opinion tends to focus on
consultations and solutions to specific issues. This difference does not
necessarily lead to contradictions. At the same time, China and Japan are two
critically important countries in the region, and the stable development of
their relations holds significant importance for both countries, the region,
and even the world.
The principles and directions established by the four political documents
between China and Japan, such as the consensus that the two countries should be
"cooperative partners rather than each other's threats," form the
"foundation" of China-Japan relations. Solving one or two specific
differences between China and Japan may not be difficult, but the thickness and
quality of the "foundation" will determine how high and stable the
friendship between the two countries can be. The perspective on and understanding
of the bilateral relationship should not be short-term and utilitarian, but
rather long-term. If a correct mutual understanding can be established and the
right direction for China-Japan relations is grasped, it will be easier to
solve some specific problems.
China's policy toward Japan has been consistent and stable. The key for future
relations will be whether Japan can continue to implement its current pragmatic
policy toward China, steadily and continuously, and seize this critical period
for developing bilateral relations to build mutual trust.
Both the Chinese and Japanese people have the proverb "A journey of a
thousand miles begins with a single step," and for both countries, now is
the right time for China-Japan relations to improve and develop.
Read more in GT:
The US's worst enemy is itself, says China's defense ministry spokesperson on US NDAA
US media's 'bad China' narrative cannot hide China's leadership in green transition
